Section 7. Glossary
Attribute |
characteristic that is of scientific and/or management importance, but insufficiently specific and/or logistically challenging to measure directly; also, ecological characteristic that specifically describes the state of Focal Components |
Baseline |
reference level derived from time periods or locations free from human pressures |
Benchmark |
indicator value suggestive of progress toward targets |
CCME |
Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment |
CFR |
Code of Federal Regulations |
Criteria |
standards against which indicators were evaluated |
Data considerations |
indicator evaluation criteria related to the actual measurement of the indicator |
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
Domain |
distinct ecological areas that contain unique qualities or traits; terrestrial, freshwater, marine, interface/ecotone |
Driver |
factor that result in pressures that cause changes in the system |
Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) |
conceptual framework that has been broadly applied in terrestrial and aquatic environmental assessments |
EBM |
Ecosystem Based Management |
Ecosystem assessment indicator |
technically robust and rigorous metric used by scientists and managers to understand of ecosystem structure and function |
EPM |
Ecosystem Portfolio Model |
ESA |
Endangered Species Act |
Focal component |
the major ecological characteristics of an ecosystem that capture the relevant scientific information in a limited number of discrete, but not necessarily independent categories |
FRAP |
Future Risk Assessment Project |
GDP |
Gross Domestic Product |
GIS |
Geographical Information System |
Impact |
measures of the effect of change in state variables such as loss of biodiversity, declines in productivity and yield, etc |
Improving indicator |
indicator that is increasing faster in the short-term but slower in the long-term than an index that captures aggregate changes in multiple indicators |
IBI |
Index of Biologic Integrity |
Indicator |
quantitative biological, chemical, physical, social, or economic measurements that serve as proxies for difficult-to-measure attributes of natural and socio-economic systems |
JISAO |
Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean |
Lagging indicator |
indicator that is increasing slower in the short- and long-term than an index that captures aggregate changes in multiple indicators |
Leading indicator |
indicator that is increasing faster in the short- and long-term than an index that captures aggregate changes in multiple indicators |
Limit |
reference level pegged to an extreme value beyond which undesired change occurs |
Management strategy evaluation (MSE) |
conceptual framework that enables the testing and comparison of different management strategies designed to achieve specified management goals |
MPA |
Marine protected areas |
NMFS |
NOAA National Martine Fisheries Service |
Nonlinearity |
sudden change in a response variable resulting from smooth and gradual change in a causal factor |
Normative reference level |
reference level defined based on what is socially acceptable, i.e., according to norms |
Norms |
define what is generally accepted within a cultural context, and may serve as societal standards to evaluate ecosystem conditions, human activities, or management strategies |
Open Standards |
Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation, developed by the Conservation Measures Partnership, Version 2.0 released in 2007. Available at http://cmp-openstandards.org/. The Open Standards are a series of five steps that comprise the project management cycle, with the aim of providing a framework and guidance for successful conservation action. They define conservation efforts as “projects,” and bring together common concepts, approaches, and terminology in conservation project design, management and monitoring. For more information, see [3]. |
Other considerations |
indicator evaluation criteria that make an indicator useful, but without which an indicator remains scientifically informative |
PAH |
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons |
PBT |
Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxics |
PCB |
polychlorinated biphenyls |
PDBE |
polybrominated diphenyl ethers |
Performance Management |
A system to track implementation and communicate progress of a conservation project or program |
Precautionary reference level |
reference level pegged to an extreme value beyond which undesired change occurs, but set to be more conservative than the limit; a.k.a. warning reference level |
Pressure |
factor that cause changes in state or condition. They can be mapped to specific drivers |
Primary considerations |
essential indicator evaluation criteria that should be fulfilled by an indicator in order for it to provide scientifically useful information about the status of the ecosystem in relation to PSP goals |
PSAT |
Puget Sound Action Team |
PSNERP |
Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project |
PSP |
Puget Sound Partnership |
PSP Goals |
combine societal values and scientific understanding to define a desired ecosystem condition, and include: Human health, Human well-being, Species and Food Webs, Habitats, Water Quantity, Water Quality |
PSSU |
Puget Sound Science Update |
Ranking scheme |
approach used to weight indicator evaluation criteria |
Reference direction |
which specifies how the trend in an indicator relates to the desired state of the ecosystem |
Reference level |
Point value or direction of change used to provide context so that changes in indicator values can be interpreted relative to desired ecosystem states |
Reference point |
Precise values of indicators used to provide context for the current status of an indicator |
Response |
Actions (regulatory and otherwise) that are taken in response to predicted impacts |
Results chains |
Map specific management strategies to their expected outcome (e.g., reduction of a threat) and their impact on key components of the ecosystem. One component in the Open Standards framework being used by the PSP to guide its performance management strategy. Results chains are diagrams that show how a particular action taken will lead to some desired result, by linking short-, medium- and long-term results in “if...then” statements. Comprised of three basic elements: strategy, expected outcomes, and desired impacts. Developed for use as part of the Puget Sound Partnership’s Performance Management System in {Neuman, 2009 #20}. |
Slipping indicator |
Indicator that is increasing faster in the long-term but slower in the short-term than an index that captures aggregate changes in multiple indicators |
SMA |
Shoreline Management Act |
SRKW |
southern resident killer whales |
State |
Condition of the ecosystem (including physical, chemical, and biotic factors) |
Target |
Reference level that signals a desired state |
Threats |
Any activities that have altered the ecosystem in the past or present, or are likely to in the future |
UERL |
|
USFWS |
|
Vital sign indicator |
Scientifically meaningful, but simple, metric that can generally inform the public and policy makers about the state of the ecosystem |
WAC |
|
WDFW |
|
WDNR |
|
WDOE |
|
WDOH |
|
WQI |
Water Quality Index |
About the Science Review
Puget Sound Science Review
- Ecosystem-Based Management: Understanding Future and Desired System States
- Section 1. Introduction
- Section 2. The Future of Puget Sound: Where are We Going?
- Section 3. An Approach to Selecting Ecosystem Indicators for Puget Sound
- Section 4. Evaluation of Potential Indicators for Puget Sound
- Section 5. Results of the Indicator Evaluations
- Section 6. Defining Ecosystem Reference Levels: A Case in Puget Sound
- Section 7. Glossary
- Ecosystem-Based Management: Incorporating Human Well-being
- Ecosystem-Based Management: Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Strategies
- The Biophysical Condition of Puget Sound: Biology
- The Biophysical Condition of Puget Sound: Chemistry
- The Biophysical Condition of Puget Sound: Physical Environment
- Threats: Impacts of Natural Events and Human Activities on the Ecosystem