More info for the terms: avoidance, cover, density, marsh
Water and emergent vegetation are important sora habitat characteristics.
Water: Soras use areas with a wide range of water depths. They are often observed in water less than 1 foot (30 cm) deep [24,38,50,54], although the average water depth of sora heavy-use areas in Arizona was 20 inches (52.2 cm) [8]. In northwestern Iowa, average water depth in sora territories was 15 inches (38.4 cm), which was significantly (p<0.025) more shallow than water depths at random locations in the marsh [27]. Sora nesting sites occurred in shallower water than random sites in western New York [34]. Average water depths reported at nest sites range from 4 inches (10.7 cm) for 4 sora nests in Colorado [23] to nearly 10 inches (24.2 cm) for sora nests in western New York [34]. In areas of deep water, soras typically wade on mats of floating vegetation [23,26].
Water level fluctuations may result in nest abandonment. For example, at a site in Colorado where water level increased more than 8 inches (20 cm), a sora nest with 7 eggs was abandoned [24]. In Alberta, soras nested in more vegetation types during a drought year, most likely due to substantially reduced water levels in the vegetation used the previous year [36].
Soras use areas with shallower water in fall than in spring [8,50,54]. It is likely that these seasonal differences reflect variation in availability of different habitats rather than habitat preference changing seasonally [54]. The mean water depths of sora locations in northeastern Missouri during spring and fall are shown in the table below [50].
Mean water depth in mm (range) Spring (n=60) 181 (27-433) Fall (n=68) 148 (54-301)
Soras typically avoid open water. There is a significant (p≤0.05) negative relationship between area of open water and sora use of wetlands in Maine [19] and sora relative abundance in Saskatchewan [57]. In western New York, sora nesting sites had a lower percentage of open water than random sites [34], and in Arizona soras used open water areas less than their availability [8].
Emergent vegetation: Sora nesting sites had larger percentage of emergent vegetation than random sites in marshes of western New York [34]. Sora numbers in wetlands of northeastern North Dakota were significantly (p<0.05) positively correlated (r=0.45) with hectares of live emergent vegetation [32]. In east and central Maine, wetlands used by soras had significantly (p=0.01) greater area of emergent vegetation than unused wetlands [19].
Density of emergent vegetation in sora habitat varies. Reported density of emergent vegetation ranges from an average of 121.9 stems/m² in sora territories in northwestern Iowa [27] to 333 stems/m² on sites in northeastern Missouri used during fall migration [50]. In western New York, cover was greater than 70% at 95% of sora nests. In addition, nesting sites had more horizontal cover at 20 inches (0.5 m) above water level than random sites [34]. However, average stem density on sora territories was not significantly (p>0.05) different from random sites in northwestern Iowa [27].
Height of emergent vegetation in sora habitat also varies. Height of vegetation reported in the literature ranged from 8 to 11 inches (20-30 cm) in the spring after a winter disturbance in northwestern Iowa [27] to 84 inches (213 cm) in areas heavily used by soras in Arizona [8]. In marshes of western New York, average vegetation height at sora nesting sites was shorter than at random locations [34]. However, the average height of emergent vegetation in sora territories in northeastern Iowa was not significantly (p>0.05) different from the height of vegetation in random plots [27].
In Arizona, both cover and height of vegetation used by soras varied with seasons. Conway suggested the differences likely reflected the varied diet of the sora [8]. The availability of habitat in different seasons is another possible source of seasonal differences in sora habitat [54].
Extent of woody vegetation surrounding South Dakota wetlands was not significantly (p=0.6) associated with sora occurrence [45]. However, in marshes of western New York, there was a significant (p=0.041) negative relationship between percent flooded timber on a site and sora relative abundance [34].
Soras may prefer some cover types. In Arizona, 65.3% of sora use was in southern cattail (Typha domingensis), although it comprised only 16.5% of the vegetation. Bulrushes and a mixed-shrub community were also used more than their availability, while saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) and arrowweed (Pluchea sericea) were avoided [8]. A literature review notes sora avoidance of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria)-dominated sites [6]. In east and central Maine, wetlands used by soras had significantly (p=0.05) more ericaceous vegetation, such as leatherleaves (Chamaedaphne spp.), sweetgales (Myrica spp.), and laurels (Kalmia spp.) [19]. In marshes of northwestern Iowa, broadleaf arrowhead (Sagittaria latifolia) occurred in sora territories significantly (p<0.01) more often than at random sites. Johnson and Dinsmore [27] imply that this likely results from both species preferring similar site conditions. In May and June in Wisconsin, soras were detected significantly (p<0.025) more often in cattail (Typha spp.) survey areas than in sedge areas [51]. However, in southeastern Wisconsin during the breeding season, there was no significant (p=0.943) difference in sora densities between habitats comprised predominantly of cattail, sedge, or bulrush [38]. In addition, soras' use of glaucous cattail (Typha à glauca), broadfruit bur-reed (Sparganium eurycarpum), sedge, river bulrush (Schoenoplectus fluviatilis), and hardstem bulrush (S. acutus var. acutus) habitats in marshes of northwestern Iowa generally reflected availability of these habitats [27].
Seasonal differences in sora habitat use have been reported. In northeastern Missouri in spring, the likelihood of detecting sora in robust emergents, such as cattail (Typha spp.) and longroot smartweed (Polygonum amphibium var. emersum), was over 6 times that of detecting soras in these areas in fall. However, availability of habitats during various times of the year was not addressed [50]. In a study performed in southeastern Missouri, plant species used by sora during spring and fall migration differed significantly (p=0.005). However, the author qualifies this finding with his observation of major seasonal differences in vegetation availability [54].
Temperature: Temperature may also influence sora abundance. In Colorado, average April temperature was significantly (p<0.01) negatively correlated (r= -0.94) with sora abundance. On sites that had average April temperatures ≤42 °F (5.6 °C), soras were more abundant than closely related Virginia rails (Rallus limicola), while on warmer sites the sora to Virginia rail ratio declined [24].
Densities: Sora densities reported in literature reviews vary from to 12 soras/acre in Colorado [12] to 0.47 pair/ha in Indiana [42]. An average of 1.3 soras/ha responded to calls across sites in Colorado [24]. A similar density of soras was found in southeastern Wisconsin [38]. In Iowa, average density over 2 years and several marsh habitats was 1.3 pairs/ha [27].
Effects of spatial arrangement/area: Landscape factors, such as marsh area, habitat edges within marshes, and the number of marshes in a region may influence soras.
Although soras occur in marshes of all sizes, they may occur at higher densities in intermediate-sized marshes. Soras were significantly (p≤0.01) positively related with total wetland area and perimeter area of surface water in east and central Maine [19] and were significantly (p<0.05) positively related to area of wetlands in Saskatchewan [57]. In Maine, soras used 10% of 2.5-acre (1 ha) wetlands, 40% to 50% of wetlands from 2.5 to 50 acres (1-20 ha) in size, and 20% of wetlands larger than 50 acres (20 ha). [19]. In western New York, soras were significantly (p=0.007) more abundant in marshes from 100 to 250 acres (41-100 ha) in size than in smaller (<100 acres (41 ha)) or larger (250-380 acres (101-155 ha)) marshes. In addition, sora nests were detected more often in the 100- to 250-acre (41-100 ha) marshes [34].
Soras also seem to prefer edge habitats. Breeding sora density was significantly (p<0.001) correlated (r=0.62) with the perimeter:area ratio of northwestern Iowa marshes. The distance from the center of sora territories to a habitat edge was also significantly (p<0.005) less than from the center of Virginia rail territories [27]. In Arizona, habitat edges were closer to sora heavy use areas than random sites [8].
Wetland dynamics at a large scale can affect soras. Indices of sora population at 3 "levels of response" were significantly (p<0.01) correlated (r≥0.70) with the number of ponds present in the prairie pothole region of North Dakota in May [47].