Degree of Threat: Medium
Comments: Causes of declines are not fully known, but introduced trout, UV-B radiation, fungal pathogens, and loss of open meadow habitat due to fire suppression have been suggested (Hayes and Jennings 1986, Fellers and Drost 1993, Blaustein et al. 1994, Kiesecker and Blaustein 1995, Fite et al. 1998, Adams et al. 2001).
Declines in Lassen Volcanic National Park apparently are due to a combination of local factors, including (1) presence of non-native predatory fishes that have restricted available habitat and limited dispersal of frogs, (2) gradual loss of open meadows and associated aquatic habitats, and (3) loss of breeding habitat due to drought (Fellers and Drost 1993). In this region, fire suppression and cessation of cattle grazing have increased the natural invasion of shrubs and trees into open meadows; former open breeding sites are now clogged with vegetation (Fellers and Drost 1993).
Decline may be related to sensitivity of eggs to increased levels of ultraviolet radiation resulting from ozone depletion (Blaustein et al. 1994), but spectral characteristics of natural waters likely shield eggs from detrimental physiological effects in all but the clearest waters (Palen et al. 2002). Increased solar radiation also may be damaging frog retinas (Fite et al. 1998).
Eggs are highly susceptible to the pathogenic fungus Saprolegnia ferax, which may be introduced during fish stocking (Kiesecker and Blaustein 1997).
Cascades frogs seem to be sensitive to habitat fragmentation. Dispersal is limited by moisture-temperature conditions (Blaustein et al. 1995). However, adults regularly range onto mountain slopes far from aquatic or wetland habitats when conditions are suitably moist (G. Hammerson, pers. obs.). and may have better dispersal ability than currently documented. For example, R. cascadae was among the first amphibians to recolonize sites after the eruption of Mount St. Helens in the southern Washington Cascades and now is common there (Karlstrom 1986; Crisafulli and Hawkins 1998; C. Crisafulli, personal communication, cited by Pearl and Adam 2005).
Agrochemicals may be a threat in some areas. Davidson et al. (2002) found support for the hypothesis that airborne agrochemicals have contributed to the decline. Fertilizers such as urea may pose a threat; in laboratory studies, juveniles were unable to sense and avoid toxic levels (Hatch et al. 2001). Nitrites may affect behavior and metamorphosis of larvae (Marco and Blaustein 1999).
An Oregon study failed to detect short-term changes in breeding phenology that might be attributable to climate change (Blaustein et al. 2001).